3 steps to present like a dataviz rockstar – part 1 [Video]

Flaming guitarWhen you share data – in a slideshow, a dashboard, or a written report – how can you give your message impact? (You know, so you persuade people that it’s a big deal, and so they act on your message.)

To help you do that, you’ll find 3 powerful steps in this post and my next:

  1. Simplify
  2. Satisfy…
  3. Storify…

Step 1’s the key (and the easiest)

Step 1’s the key (and the easiest), and step 3’s perhaps the most adv­anced – which is why I’ve put them in that order.

This post covers step 1, and my next post will cover steps 2 and 3.

You can add steps 2 and 3 to have more and more impact

If you’re relatively new to presenting data, you can use step 1 by itself to help get your message across. (And if you’re more experienced, you can add steps 2 and 3 to have more and more impact.)

 

Step 1: Simplify your content

Below, you’ll see 3 tips (labelled A, B and C) for step 1. I hope you find them helpful, and that they make this step easier to apply.

Here’s what you’ll find in this post:

 

Why this step?Scroll to Contents ↑

People have so little time to absorb all your work

As you might’ve spent days or even weeks working on your dataviz, it’s easy to forget that your audience is probably seeing it for the first time. As a result, it can easily go over their heads because people have so little time (and motiva­tion!) to absorb all your work.

So unless you present it simply, you’ll severely limit your impact (even if you also do steps 2 and 3). That’s why the crucial step is to simplify what you share.

But, I hear you say:

“Stop – I don’t want to oversimplify all my work!”

On that point, I love what Cole Knaflic (author of Storytelling With Data) has said:

“This is not about oversimplifying, but rather
not making things more complicated
than they need to be”
Cole Nussbaumer Knaflic

I’ve put this step’s 3 tips in decreasing order of “bang for your buck”, meaning tip A has most impact (from little effort), and arguably tip C has least impact

 

1a: Reduce coloursScroll to Contents ↑

Along with things like shape and size, colour’s known as a pre-attentive attribute. That means our brains process colour thousands of times faster than we can read numbers (or words).

If you use lots of colour, people won’t know where to look

Partly because of that, colour draws people’s attention very strongly. So, if you use lots of colour – like in the default charts typical of Excel and PowerPoint – people won’t know where to look.

On top of that, in any audience there are almost bound to be people with some form of colour blindness. That’s why it’s best to use colour sparing­ly, and with care.

Use one intense colour for where you want people to focus

An effective approach is to use:

  • One intense colour for where you want people to focus
  • Grey for the rest of your data

Here’s Cole Knaflic explaining this approach (in a 30-second clip):

Want to see an example? Here’s dataviz expert Ann K Emery showing how that might look on a bar chart (in just 20 seconds):

 

1b: Reduce textScroll to Contents ↑

Your listeners can’t properly do these 2 language-based tasks at once

Reducing text’s especially important if you’re sharing your data in a presentation (rather than a dashboard or written report). That’s because your listeners can’t properly do these 2 language-based tasks at once:

  • Listen to you speaking.
  • Read text on your slides.

That’s why I recommend you use about 15 words (at most) per slide. (That might seem like a really low number. So to see why it applies, please follow that link.)

Here’s Nancy Duarte (author of Slide:ology) backing up that point in just 20 seconds:

Even if you’re sharing your data in a written report – where people have more time to absorb it than they do on a slide – reducing text and using short, simple words (whenever you can) still helps to get your message across better.

Think how a senior leader might say it

Worried that people will think you’re being too informal? Think how a senior leader (or someone like Warren Buffett or Steve Jobs) might say it in a press briefing. His or her language would tend to be businesslike but conversational, not complex or formal.

 

1c: Reduce “chartjunk”Scroll to Contents ↑

“Chartjunk” means any chart elements that don’t convey useful information. Examples include shadows, gradient fills, and 3D effects. (The term was coined by Edward Tufte in his book, The Visual Display of Quantitative Information.)

This (unnarrated) 1-minute video shows lots of chartjunk you might choose to remove:

Mind you, it’s debatable whether some parts of your chart (like gridlines and axis lines) should be removed, or should just be faded so they stand out less. For instance, Stephen Few (the well-known author of 3 books on data visualisation) argues against removing too much “non-data ink”, as Edward Tufte also calls it.

Reducing chartjunk helps people focus on your findings

In any event, reducing chartjunk helps people focus on your findings, rather than being distracted by redundant parts of your chart. So I highly recommend you make your dataviz as clean and uncluttered as you can.

As an example, in the 1-minute video below, Leila Gharani (who’s a Microsoft MVP) cites specific measurements from an eye-tracking study to back up the point that you shouldn’t use 3D charts:

 

Summary and next stepsScroll to Contents ↑

As a reminder, here are the 3 tips I suggest you use to simplify your content – to give it more impact:

  1. Reduce colours
  2. Reduce text
  3. Reduce “chartjunk”

Do you have any queries or comments about the points shared in this post? Feel free to post a comment below, or on social media.

Thanks for reading, and look out for my next post for steps 2 and 3!

 

Also check outScroll to Contents ↑

Advertisement

2 thoughts on “3 steps to present like a dataviz rockstar – part 1 [Video]

  1. These are great tips, Craig. Simple, but effective. The last tip – using 2D instead of 3D on charts and graphs – is something I constantly try to (gently) beat into my clients. 3D should only be used when what you are showing actually has three dimensions (e.g., the brain, the engine in a car). I even wrote about this way back in 2009: https://bit.ly/3vO3oSE

    Like

What’s YOUR view?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.